BACON, Francis

Fables of the Ancients, in Philosophy, Morality, and Civil Policy; Illustrated and Explained. A New Edition, With Notes Critical and Explanatory, by Dr. Shaw.

London, Thomas Tegg and J. Dick, 1813.

£75

8vo., pp. (ix) 10-44. Roman letter, undecorated. Twelve spirited woodcut plates illustrating the text. A little yellowing and the odd mark. A good clean copy in its original paper boards, publisher’s advertisement on rear cover, very old cloth re-back.

B74

BACON, Francis

Fables of the Ancients, in Philosophy, Morality, and Civil Policy; Illustrated and Explained.

London, J. Cundee for M. Jones, 1803.

£75

8vo., frontispiece, pp. (vi) 136. Roman letter, finely engraved portrait of Bacon by H. Cook, woodcut illustrations (plates) and ornaments. Frontispiece a bit stained from bookplate glue on recto, light yellowing. A good almost uncut copy in modern calf. Contemporary autograph of John R on first leaf, and H.M. Silvanus 1891 (mathematician and chess player) on fly. A ‘new edition’ by Dr. Shaw.

B70

BACON, Francis

Of the Advancement and Proficience of Learning or the Partitions of Science.

Oxford, Leonard Lichfield for Robert Young and Ed. Forest, 1640.

£1,250

FIRST EXPANDED EDITION in English, second state. Folio pp. (xxxii) 478, (xx). Roman and italic initials, head- and tail-pieces, woodcut initials, engraved frontispiece and title page, faint embossed stamp to margin of title page. Frontispiece and title-page slightly browned with a few damp stains, light age yellowing throughout but a good copy in modern calf antique, all edges red.

Gibson 141b.

B27

JOHN of SALISBURY

A DEFENSE OF LIBERAL POLITICAL EDUCATION

Policraticus sive De nugis Curialium, et vestigiis philosophorum Metalogicus.

Leiden, Ioannis Maire, 1639.

£1,450

8vo., pp. (xvi) 931 (i). Mostly Roman letter, title in red and black with printer’s woodcut device, C17 autograph of Petrus Guizard either side, woodcut ornament at end. Slight browning, light foxing, a good copy in contemporary vellum, yapp fore-edges, later morocco label, a.e.r. Engraved bookplate of Frances Nash on pastedown, early shelf mark at head, five digit number on blank verso of title page, early manuscript price on rear pastedown, a.e.r.

The two most important works of John of Salisbury (c. 1115-1180), scholar, diplomat, bishop, politician, historian and philosopher, the most intellectually accomplished Englishman of his day, and certainly the best known representative of English learning in continental Europe. The Policraticus or “Statesman’s Book” is a discourse on the principle of government and is one of the most important medieval treatises on statecraft and political theory.

John knew what he was writing about; having studied at Paris principally under Abelard, he spent several years at the court of Pope Eugene III before becoming private secretary to Theobald, Archbishop of Canterbury, and then his successor Thomas Becket. He was at the centre of the troubled dealings between Becket, King Henry II, his barons, and Pope Adrian IV, and legend has it he was present and injured at Beckett’s martyrdom. As John himself put it, with Henry’s increasing foreign absences “the charge of all Britain as touching church matters, was laid upon me”. Falling into disfavour gave him time to write this massive analysis of political and public life from a philosophical and ethical point of view. He discusses the virtues and vices of a prince, the constitutions of the ancients, the abuses of courtiers, the corruption of the state, the justification of tyrannicide, the unity and functioning of society, the role and obligations of the military, the duties and responsibilities of power in church and state.

In the Metalogicus, John defends the study of logic and philosophy, and the scholastic syllabus, against opponents of a liberal education. It is the first Western attempt to provide an outline for incorporating the whole of Artistotle’s Organon, which he considers in detail, into a college curriculum. It is also of great value as giving us one of the clearest insights into the teaching and subject matter of the Parisian schools of the first half of the 12th century.

This is the second and best early edition of the Metalogicus. The first (Paris, 1610) is both inaccurate and incomplete.

Shaaber J215. Brunet III 547.

L2071

Print This Item Print This Item

RICHARDSON, Alexander

TAUGHT TO CHARLES CHAUMY AND JOHN WILSON

The logicians school-master: or, A comment vpon Ramus logicke

London, Miles Flesher for Iohn Bellamie, 1629.

£4,750

FIRST EDITION. 4to. pp. (ii), 340. (A)² B-2V⁴ 2X². (without A1 blank). Roman letter, some Italic. Title within double box rule with woodcut ornament, historiated woodcut initials, typographical headpieces, early of autograph of ‘Milo Gale’ on front fly, Tho. Gale beneath. Light age yellowing with some minor spotting in places, scattered worm holes and tracks in lower blank margin, not touching text, upper margin shaved, the odd ink spot and pencil underlining in places. A good copy in contemporary calf, covers double blind ruled to a panel design, blind fleurons to outer corners, spine with raised bands, double blind ruled in compartments, all edges speckled red, outer edge of lower cover and extremities worn.

First edition of this most influential treatise on Logic and rhetoric which were the speciality of Richardson’s school at Barking. His posthumous work was principally concerned with Ramus (1515-1572), whose Dialectica had appeared as Logike in the English version of 1574. After graduating, Richardson found employment as tutor to the children of Thomas Fanshawe (c.1533 – 1601) of Ware Park in Hertfordshire. Fanshawe left money to Richardson who set up his school at Barking around 1607 where “he offered instruction to graduates preparing for their MA examinations. It became in effect a seminary for the godly: among future eminent ministers who benefited from Richardson’s tuition were William Ames, John Barlow, Daniel Cawdrey, Charles Chauncy, John Greenham, Thomas Hooker, George Walker, and John Yates” DNB. They also note that Richardson is the first known user of terms such as ‘contradicent’, ‘distributively’, ‘heterozetesis’, ‘polyzetesis’, ‘privant’, ‘privately’, and ‘relate’ (noun). He is the only known user of ‘adjunctity’, ‘axiomation’, ‘inartificial’ (noun), ‘quadrichotomy’, and ‘unmatch’ (noun).

“Cotton Mather once wrote of a teacher whose influence on his student was so pervasive that, as the student developed, he became a virtual copy of the teacher. That student was Thomas Hooker, and his teacher was Alexander Richardson. (…) A generation later, Samuel Stone also studied with Richardson and was deeply influenced by his theological system. Stone’s Whole Body of Divinity is based entirely on “the methodicall Tables of A. R.,” as Richardson’s theological theses were described. The (eventual) Boston pastor John Wilson was a Richardson student; the overemphasis on ‘works’ that John Cotton’s followers were to detect in Wilson almost surely reflects the influence of Richardson. Just who was this extraordinarily influential figure, a luminary of whom Hooker “would sometimes say, That next to converting Grace, he blessed God for his Acquaintance with the Principles and Writings of that Learned Man, Mr. Alexander Richardson.” In addition to Hooker, Stone, and Wilson, William Ames, John Yates, and the future Harvard President Charles Chauncy were among those who studied with Richardson.

Richardson’s lectures on dialectic and the arts circulated in manuscript until 1629, when they appeared as The Logicians School-Master. Kennedy and Thomas Knoles concluded that the continuing influence of Ramist logic at Harvard “may actually have had more to do with the work of Richardson,” a “creative and eclectic thinker” who “criticized, adjusted, and explained Ramism in the context of Renaissance logic in general.” Baird L. Tipson “Seeing the World Through Ramist Eyes: The Richardsonian Ramism of Thomas Hooker and Samuel Stone”. A very good, unsophisticated copy of this rare first edition.

STC 21012. ESTC S115931.

L1861

Print This Item Print This Item

BACON, Francis

The Twoo Bookes…Of the proficience and aduancement of Learning.

London, Henrie Tomes, 1605.

£4,750

FIRST EDITION. 4to. pp. (ii) 46; 1-120. Roman and Italic, woodcut initials. A fine, well margined copy. Light age yellowing, in red morocco, gilt-stamped panels on covers and richly gilt spine in six compartments by Bedford, all edges gilt.

Gibson 81, Pforzheimer 36.

B2

Print This Item Print This Item

EUTROPIUS

AN ACCOUNT OF THE GALLIC WARS

Epitome Belli Gallici.

£3,750

Paris, Robert Estienne, 1544.

FIRST EDITION, 8vo., pp. (ii) 3-134 (civ). Mostly Italic, some Roman letter, a little Greek. Estienne’s woodcut Noli Alterum Sapere device on title page, woodcut diagram in text. Early manuscript price mark (?) on title page, contemporary manuscript annotation to K4. In a very handsome contemporary calf binding, covers ruled and panelled in blind, central section within border of ornate flowers and garlands, two medallion heads on panel within, vellum stubs. Lower cover with single but significant diagonal crack, very small repairs at head and tail of spine. A good, clean copy with wide margins, a.e.r.

The impressive contemporary calf binding of this copy strongly resembles Oldham HM23 “only one example is known” and is almost certainly English, though “many of the panels used in England no doubt came from the Netherlands” (Oldham p. 20). The text itself consists of a brief summary, the Epitome of the Gallic Wars, taken from Suetonius’ iconic work. Eutropius was a late Roman historian and secretary (magister memoriae) at Constantinople. Written in a straightforward narrative style, with none of the syntactical twists and turns of Suetonius’ original Latin, the text rattles through the most important campaigns waged by Julius Caesar during the Gallic and Civil Wars, moving on to his Dictatorship and death at the hands of the Senate in only a few pages.

This is followed by notes on the Commentary on Caesar’s Gallic and Civil Wars, by Henricus Glareanus: these consist of short summaries of each book and explanations of any obscure place names or peoples (e.g. the tribe known as the Sedusi who, Glareanus tells us, ‘non sunt Seduni see Germani’, referencing Pliny 4.17). Glareanus also explains, with a diagram, Caesar’s battle formation, and the various numbers of his troops. The work ends with four alphabetical indexes: the first refers back to Glareanus’ annotations on the commentary, the second gives the French equivalents of Roman place names and tribes mentioned in Caesar’s text; the third, longer notes on these places and tribes, and the fourth is an index of Caesar’s text itself. This beautifully bound edition must have been a very handy condensed textbook for any student of Caesar who had neither the time nor the inclination for the original work.

Renouard 60:13. Adams E1133 + pt C38. See also Goldschmidt LI.

L1853

Print This Item Print This Item

GAETANI, Enrico

ADVICE FOR A GENTLEMAN AT WAR

Instructions for Young Gentlemen.

Oxford, John Lichfield, 1633.

£2,350

FIRST ENGLISH EDITION. 12mo. pp. (viii) 122 (ii). Roman letter within double ruled line border; errata on recto of last. A very good, clean wide-margined copy in contemporary limp vellum, later vellum superimposed over spine, lacking ties. Acquisition note of Thomas Clifford 1647, 1s 3d, to rear free endpaper.

A translation of an untraced original, subtitled “The instructions of Cardinall Sermonetta to his Cousen Petro Caetano, at his first going into Flanders to the Duke of Parma, to serve Philip, King of Spaine,” the work comprises a set of instructions to a young nobleman entering military and royal service. It begins with the necessity of maintaining regular communication by writing from every stopping place to both confirm his progress, report upon the state of the war and to find out what is to be done in service to the King. The need for discretion and secrecy in his letters is advised, as well as the keeping of detailed records to eliminate confusion. As well as sending letters of his own, it is vital that he answer fully all missives, using the cypher that he receives.

Cardinal Sermonetta advises his cousin to develop a close relationship with the postmaster, rewarding him intermittently for his continued good services so he would remain loyal and work with haste. Petro was evidently sent to Flanders at the desire of his father and was impelled to do his utmost to ensure the satisfaction of the Prince with his service, combining excellence in war and a thorough knowledge of the context in which hostilities had developed. It behooves him to demonstrate honour and an encyclopaedic knowledge of the state of affairs of the nation, topographically and socially as well as militarily. The Cardinal also encourages him to construct a dictionary of the terminology and tactics of warfare for his own use, and to participate as actively as possible in military life. Great emphasis is placed upon acting and speaking appropriately around the royals. The work concludes within a warning to always respect the sanctity of religious establishments, personages and artefacts, before commending him to God.

Here, the war in question is the Eighty Years’ War, the revolt of the Seventeen Provinces in the Low Countries against the Spanish (Habsburg) Empire. Shortly after the publication of this letter in 1639, Spain sent an Armada to Flanders carrying 20,000 troops to assist in a last large scale attempt to defeat the northern “rebels”. The Armada was defeated in the Battle of the Downs, marking the end of Spain as the dominant sea power.

Thomas Clifford, in ex libris, may well be the first Baron Clifford of Chudleigh (1630-1673), who probably acquired this work at the appropriate age of seventeen. He went on to distinguish himself in naval battles, including at the end of the Dutch War.

STC 11514, recording only 7 copies, BL, two at Oxford, one at Cambridge; Folger, Huntington and Yale in the US. Not in Lowndes.

L728

Print This Item Print This Item

VEREPAEUS, Simon


Selectiores epistolae clarorum virorum. (with) MACROPEDIUS, Georgius. Methodus de conscribendis epistolis.

Antwerp, Apud Ioannem Bellerum, 1573-74

£950

8vo. pp. (xvi) 148 (ii). ff. (ii) 123 (i), with parts of two related works: pp. (viii) 74. (ii, blank). ff. 16-40. Italic and Roman letter, a little Greek, printers’ devices on both t-ps, a few woodcut initials and tailpieces. Light age yellowing, contemp. ms marginal notes on three ll. of second work, light marginal waterstain to final gathering, contemp. ms autograph “M. Christoph. Gri[…] Pannonii” and of “[…] Rhetorica […]” on first t-p, contemp. ms rhetorical passage on final pastedown. A good, clean copy in C16th German blind-stamped ¼ pigskin with a roll of Biblical portraits, boards from a C15th liturgical vellum ms (with neumes), spine with three raised bands (two holes), contemp. ms title on top fore edge, long leather ties.

Rare editions of a collection of Renaissance treatises on rhetoric and epistolary science, designed for students, by three north European authors and teachers. Simon Verepaeus (c. 1522-1598), philosopher and theologian, compiled various textbooks including the present. His work includes letters by famous Italian Humanists such as Pietro Bembo, Iacopo Sadoleto, Cristoforo Longolio and Paolo Manuzio, chosen as models of current literary style. Macropedius Georgius, or Joris van Lanckvelt, (1487-1558), was educated at the grammar school of ‘s-Hertogenbosch in the Netherlands, where Erasmus of Rotterdam had been some twenty years before. In 1502 Macropedius became a member of the Brothers of the Common Life in the same town and from the age of twenty he had begun writing Latin plays and textbooks for students’ use. The present work, his most famous, was first published in 1543 in Antwerp under the title of Epistolica, and successively in ten different editions in the Netherlands. Between 1580 and 1649 the work was published no less than six times in London alone and it seems to have been used at schools throughout western Europe.

Macropedius’ success was not only limited to his writing. As headmaster in ‘s-Hertongenbosch, Liège and Utrecht he taught many students who later became influential men in government, science and the arts, such as the geographer Gerard Mercator, the printer-editor Laurentius Torrentinus and the physician Johannes Wier, who doubted belief in witchcraft as early as 1563. Christoph Hegendorf (1500-1540) was a philologist who played an important rule in the history of the German Reformation, taught Greek literature and wrote many works, most of which are rare. The related fragments at the end belong to two different books. The former, without the title page, is a rhetorical work by Audomarus Talaeus dealing with the figures of speech, the types of metre and the use of the voice and the body. The latter is not identified and comprises some chapters about the liberal arts and the five senses.

Verepaeus: Not in BM STC Dutch, Adams, Graesse or Belgica Typographica. Macropedius-Hegendorf: This edn. not in BM STC Ger, Adams or Graesse.

L153

Print This Item Print This Item

MIDDLETON, Richard of

DIALOGUE ON THEOLOGY AND MUNDANE LIFE

In quartus sententiarum resolute questiones. (with) Questiones quodlibetales.

Venice, Lazarus Soardus, 5 September and 10 July 1509.

£3,250

Two works in one. Folio. ff (xii) 237; 43 (-blank f6). Double column, Gothic letter in two sizes, plain and foliated woodcut initials, extensive printed side notes, publisher’s white on black device on verso of last. Title page a bit foxed, infrequent contemporary manuscript notes, underlinings, small hole affecting a very few letters to A2, faint damp stain towards outer margins in a few quires. A very good, clean, well-margined copy in contemporary vellum, slightly later vellum spine superimposed. Early paper library label and title to spine, edges speckled red and black.

Rare edition by Benzonus of Middleton’s commentary on the fourth book of Peter Lombard’s great ‘Sentences,’ accompanied by ‘Quodlibeta,’ related disputations. It was one of very few works by an Englishman of sufficient reputation to be internationally printed in the incunable and post-incunable periods. The fourth book covers ‘the sacraments in general, the seven sacraments in particular, and the four last things, death, judgment, hell, and heaven.’ (Catholic Encyclopaedia).

The Quodlibeta were answers to scholarly questions posed by pupils or by interested parties. They address many and varied topics, religious and scientific, including one of the earliest discussions of hypnotism, auto-suggestion, and telepathy. The possibility of resurrection, the nature of the human intellect, whether Peter sinned when he denied Christ, the meaning of ‘good luck,’ if one has sinned having done something through direst necessity, and the morality of the marriage of two persons of wildly differing years i.a. are discussed.

The standard theological textbook of the medieval university, the ‘Sentences’ is a compilation of extracts from the Bible, religious Fathers (especially Augustine), and other sources of authority, and covers the whole body of theological doctrine to form the basis for virtually the entire field of Christian theology and its scholastic interpretation. It represented the first effort to bring together commentaries on the full range of theological issues on a systematic basis, and present different views on complex theological points. A commentary on the ‘Sentences’ was required of every aspiring master of theology, making it the predominant non-Biblical work most commented on up to the 16th C, and Middleton’s was regarded as a leader in the field.

Richard of Middleton (c. 1249 – 1302) was a Franciscan friar, theologian and philosopher. His works pioneer the move away from a strict Augustinian theology to a more scholastic one. Known as ‘doctor solidus et fundatissimus,’ he was a friend of Duns Scotus, who also composed a commentary on the ‘Sentences.’ Perhaps the most famous argument Middleton advances in this commentary (first published in 1489) is his fierce opposition to the ordination of women. As well as the more conventional objections to the weak and emotional character, and submissive nature of women rendering them wholly unfit for office, he also advances the compelling argument that women cannot be ordained, as the tonsure which is required for minor orders would not be suitably becoming to females.

This edition, published as part of a four volume series between 1507 and 1509, is significantly expanded from the Gregorii editions of 1489 and 1499, and is the most complete Mediavilla commentary on the final, and arguably most theologically significant, section of the ‘Sentences.’

BM STC It. p554. Shaaber R36 (11 places). Adams M1422 & M1425.

L884

Print This Item Print This Item